Skip to main content

Jury Rights Day

Jury Rights Day

FIJA has celebrated Jury Rights Day on September 5 each year for more than 25 years to commemorate the famous case of William Penn in 1670 which laid the foundation for the right that jurors have still today to conscientiously acquit someone by jury nullification.


Celebrate Jury Rights Day

Please join us this year in celebrating Jury Rights Day nationwide! Here are some easy ways to get involved:

  • On or close to 5 September, spend an hour in front of a local courthouse with friends sharing FIJA brochures. We’ll even provide a free event kit if you organize one!
  • Make signs and host a Jury Rights Day sign wave on the corners of a busy intersection.
  • Invite friends over for a movie night focused on a jury-related plot.
  • Speak to a local civic group or school about the history of Jury Rights Day and the protective role of the jury.
  • Submit an op-ed or write a letter to the editor of a local or national publication or website discussing jury nullification and Jury Rights Day.
  • Call into or be a guest on a talk radio show to discuss jury rights.
  • Host a FIJA table at a county fair, farmers market, hempfest, gun show or another public event on or close to Jury Rights Day.

Be sure to join the Jury Rights Day 2019 event page on Facebook to show your support and keep up as we share announcements, resources, and so on as we help you gear up for Jury Rights Day.

Click here to request your FREE Jury Rights Day event kit for a limited time!



History of Jury Rights Day

On this day in 1670, William Penn of London was arrested for publicly preaching the Quaker religion in violation of England’s Conventicle Act, which outlawed the public practice of religions other than the Church of England.

Though he had technically broken the law, Penn pled Not Guilty. Nonetheless, the court repeatedly demanded that the jurors find Penn guilty, rejecting any other verdict and sending them back to deliberate again and again. To coerce jurors to convict Penn under this unjust law, the court jailed the noncompliant jurors in England's notorious Newgate prison during deliberations. The court withheld from them food and water, tobacco, fire, and even so much as a chamberpot.

Despite this abuse, jurors refused to comply. Eventually the court accepted their Not Guilty verdicts for both Penn and Meade, but then fined them forty marks each in punishment and sentenced them to confinement once again in Newgate prison until their fines were paid.

Some of the jurors appealed the fines and imprisonment.  In this appeal, known as Bushel’s case after the jury foreman Edward Bushel, the higher court ruling confirmed that jurors cannot be punished for their verdicts, even if a law has technically been broken. Penn’s and Bushel’s cases not only firmly established our jury rights in the common law tradition, but also laid a foundation for freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of assembly that we hold dear still today.

Jurors’ refusal to enforce unjust or unjustly applied laws is known as jury nullification, jury veto, or conscientious acquittal. It is a crucial tool that citizens have to restrain government. This authority is our peaceful protection to stop corrupt government servants from violating our rights.